Category: Accounting News

Working capital is the difference between a business’ current assets and liabilities. Negative working capital can happen when a business’ current assets are below its current liabilities. Therefore, working Capital = Accounts Receivable + Inventory – Accounts Payable. It’s a way to measure a company’s ability to meet short-term liabilities, such as managing inventory, satisfying vendor bills, etc., and how well its longer-term investments are implemented.

When a business has a surplus of current assets against its current liabilities, it’s said to have positive working capital. Generally speaking, when it’s positive, the business is able to service liabilities over the next 12 months, putting it in a good financial position. However, it’s important to understand how positive working capital is comprised. If a business has a sizeable outstanding accounts receivable account or has too much inventory, the company’s resources are not utilized efficiently. With money tied up in such areas and not financed by short-term liabilities, but with long-term capital, the long-term capital can’t be used for long-term investments.  

When working capital is either even or negative, it’s a way to gauge how (in)efficiently a business handles near-term financial obligations. Reasons why negative working capital exists include a business making one-time cash payments due to a business’ current assets markedly dropping. Similarly, current liabilities can increase massively with more accounts payable and increasing credit.

Delving into Negative Working Capital

When analyzing negative working capital, it’s important to see how it’s connected to the current ratio. The current ratio is a business’ current assets divided by its current liabilities. When the current ratio’s calculation is less than 1.0, the business has more current liabilities than current assets, resulting in negative working capital.

Temporary negative working capital may exist when a company spends excessively or sees a steep increase in outstanding bills due to buying input materials and services from its suppliers. Though extended periods of negative working capital could be a red flag because the business might have a problem paying immediate bills and is being forced to depend on financing or raising funds via equity issuances to manage its working capital, it gives insight into the company’s financial barometer.

Negative Working Capital Requires Judgment

Depending on the type of business and its working capital levels, a negative working capital figure may or may not indicate there’s a concern. Retail, grocery, and subscription negative working capital may not be bad; however, for capital-intensive companies, negative working capital might indicate trouble. One way to measure working-level capital is through the Cash Conversion Cycle (CCC). The CCC determines whether negative working capital is from efficient operations or cash flow constraints.

It looks at:

1. Days Inventory Outstanding (DIO) or how long the inventory waits before a sale is made.

2. Days Sales Outstanding (DSO) or how long before an invoice is paid to the company.

3. Days Payable Outstanding (DPO) or how many days it takes a company to pay its vendors’ invoices.

Where: CCC = DIO + DSO – DPO

If the resulting number from the CCC is negative, it indicates the company is receiving payments from its customers well before it needs to pay vendors/suppliers. A company with this type of result is in good shape financially. However, if the CCC is positive and meets some of the criteria, it would require further investigation to see if the negative working capital is worrisome. Examples of a company’s poor operation include higher accounts payable days, turnover slows, falling revenue, and accounts receivable collection timeframes increasing.

Conclusion

When it comes to working capital, it requires analysis as to why a company’s working capital level is at the level it is. Taking the level at face value doesn’t give the evaluator the full picture.

Whether it’s maintaining compliance with accounting standards or ensuring asset values are not overvalued for internal stakeholders or external existing or potential new investors, looking at net realizable value (NRV) is an important concept to understand and discuss how it’s implemented.

Defining NRV

Net realizable value examines what an asset can be sold for after accounting for selling or disposal costs. This results in the final value of inventory or accounts receivable. Used by both the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), it embodies the concept of accounting conservatism that compares NRV to the inventory’s cost. This notion leads accountants to value assets to produce lower profits and not overvalue assets when expert analysis is mandated for the deal review.

NRV is used in the lower-cost or market method of accounting reporting. The market method reporting approach requires a business’ inventory must be reported on the balance sheet at a lower value than either the historical cost or the market value. If there’s no known market value of the inventory, the NRV value can be used to approximate the market value.  

Calculating NRV

Step 1: The asset’s projected selling price or market value must be determined.

Step 2: The manufacturing and sales expenses connected with the asset must be determined. This also includes advertising and conveyance fees, for example, when factoring in costs.

Step 3: Determine the gap between the asset’s projected asking amount and the fees the company incurs to finish the goods and sell it.

This is calculated via the following formula:

NRV = Expected Selling Price – Total Production and Selling Costs

If a company is looking to sell a percentage of its inventory, it needs to figure out the NRV of the inventory that will be sold.

Assuming the selling price is $10,000, it needs to spend $1,500 on finishing costs and another $750 in transportation expenses. Therefore, NRV is calculated as follows:

NRV = $10,000 – ($1,500 + $750) = $7,750

When it comes to valuing current assets such as accounts receivable (AR), this approach can similarly determine the NRV of the unpaid invoices from their clients. This is accomplished by summing their ARs and then subtracting the uncollectible accounts. For example, if there’s $100,000 in outstanding invoices, but $20,000 is uncollectible due to clients’ inability to pay or otherwise cannot be collected. In this type of calculation, instead of determining the production and sales amounts, a business’ allowance for doubtful accounts is substituted. 

Conclusion

While these calculations assist investors and business owners in determining accurate costs of current assets, there are some considerations. For example, in periods of inflation or deflation, businesses must continually evaluate the net amount of the resulting calculation instead of the gross figures. Along with the increased and continual updating of NRVs, since the future price discovery of asset prices is unknown, there’s always room for uncertainty, which investors are constantly trying to determine how efficiently the market is presently pricing things.

While NRV is a single type of calculation, it’s an important one that can help businesses make the most of their inventory, accounts receivable, and similar accounting entries.

Bad debt expense is an important concept that businesses must account for when it comes to their financial reporting. Regardless of the timeframe a company accounts for, it helps companies determine what portion of their receivables are collectible and what portion are not – and therefore, a bad debt expense. Depending on the receivables’ amount, this bad debt expense can take the form of either the allowance method or the direct write-off method.

Direct Write-Off Method Explained

While a company can see its receivables increase quickly, collections of these receivables might not be possible in the future due to client defaults. The direct write-off method is recommended for accounts with nominal amounts in question. A company’s receivables account sees an immediate write-off with this method. This lowers a company’s revenue, reducing net income. When it comes to accounting for it properly, the journal entry for the direct write-off method is as follows:

Description: Uncollectible ABC Account

Therefore, the journal entry would debit $500 to the Bad Debt Expense and credit $500 to the Accounts Receivable for the ABC Account.

Allowance Method

When it comes to more substantive or material amounts, businesses are inclined to use the Allowance Method because it’s set up to interact well with contra asset accounts that offset accounts receivable. Reported on the balance sheet, a contra asset account has an opposite balance to accounts receivable, and the journal entry is as follows:

Assets

Cash: $500,000

Accounts receivable: $300,000

Less: Allowance for doubtful accounts: $25,000

Equipment: $200,000

Less Accumulated Depreciation: $5,000

Building: $100,000

Less Accumulated Depreciation: $15,000

Since there’s zero impact on income statement accounts, contra accounts are advantageous for companies to use since the revenues aren’t lowered from a direct loss that bad debt expenses can cause with other methods.

When it comes to the Allowance Method in action, the three components are as follows:

First Step: Assess the uncollectible receivables

This is done by either determining the percentage of sales or by the percentage of receivables.

Percentage of Sales Method

This is usually determined by taking a percentage of either net or total credit sales. It’s generally dictated by past trends (both internal and macro economy forecast). For example, 2 percent of $10,000,000 = $200,000.

Percentage of Receivables

This method works by looking at the aging schedule for receivables, including those that are due but not yet late. For example, the receivables that are not late but not yet paid can have a low percentage for the particular bucket. Each successive and later bucket of unpaid receivables would require a higher percentage estimated as uncollectible.

Second Step: Journal entries are notated by entering the bad debt expense as a debit and the allowance for doubtful accounts as a credit.

Third Step: After an account is considered permanently uncollectible, the last two entries are as follows:

Conclusion: The Importance of Calculating Bad Debt Expense

When it comes to determining a company’s results, it is required in their financial statements. If a company does not include this information, their assets could be inflated, potentially leading to overstating their net income. Calculating bad debt expense also helps companies determine which customers have defaulted on past bills, while at the same time highlighting customers that pay on time.

When it comes to accounting for bad debt expense, businesses that are experts at the two methods can effectively navigate the needs of internal and external audiences.

Depreciation can help a business realize tax benefits, maintain compliance with financial reporting requirements, and project asset replacement. The half-year convention for depreciation is an important practice to understand.

For fixed assets, depreciation is recognized and recorded on a 50 percent basis for the initial and concluding years over its schedule. This supposes that fixed assets have been in service for 50 percent of their initial calendar service year upon acquisition. It’s normally implemented by taxation agencies to limit the upper limits for depreciation attestations to 50 percent of the yearly figures.

The balance of the annual 50 percent depreciation amount is recognized/recorded during the depreciation schedule’s last year, as the fixed asset will be removed from service mid-year. Regardless of the type of depreciation – straight-line, double-declining, etc. – the half-year convention applies equally.

This has been instituted because businesses were tempted to buy fixed assets in the third or fourth quarter of a fiscal year and try to deduct it fully via complete depreciation deduction. However, this convention is explicit in that fixed assets in service on or after July 1 may only deduct half of otherwise normal depreciation schedules.

How It Works

In this example, Production Equipment is purchased for $50,000 on April 1, 2022, with a useful life of 7 years. Using the half-year convention, depreciation is as follows:

Straight-line Depreciations = Cost of Asset / Useful Life = $50,000 / 7 = $7,142.86

Half-Year Convention: $7,142.86 / 2 = $3,571.43

This also assumes that there’s no scrap of salvage value. Although there are 7 years for the item’s useful life, with the half-year convention, it’s treated as 8 years for the depreciation schedule:

Year 1: $3,571.43

Year 2: $7,142.86

Year 3: $7,142.86

Year 4: $7,142.86

Year 5: $7,142.86

Year 6: $7,142.86

Year 7: $7,142.86

Year 8: $3,571.43

Context for Depreciation Convention

A depreciation convention gives context on how depreciation is performed by the company. It guides the company on available depreciation methods based on the asset’s useful life, how much the asset can be depreciated once it’s removed from service, and how depreciation is accounted/claimed in the initial and final year during the asset’s recovery period.

Depending on the situation and the type of depreciation convention involved, the following are some different conventions and how they vary:

• Full Month permits a business to get a complete month of depreciation for the month when the asset has been put in service. There’s no depreciation taken for the month of disposal.
• Next Month permits a business to start recording depreciation for the fixed assets the following month and being able to record one month of depreciation “when disposed of.”
• Actual Days permits depreciation to be recorded for every single day an asset is in service during its fiscal year.
• Mid-Quarter permits depreciation for half of the 3-month business period whenever the asset’s been put in place and disposed of (for both quarters).

Conclusion

While this is illustrative of financial reporting requirements, it’s an important consideration for business owners and their accounting professionals. Optimizing fixed asset depreciation leads to more accurate books, which will help in tax planning.

When it comes to financial analysis, there are two metrics that internal stakeholders and external users, such as investors and analysts, can use to assist with analyzing a business’s operations.

Free cash flow to the firm (FCFF) is used as part of a discount cash flow (DCF) calculation that aids in determining a company’s intrinsic value, helping investors make better informed decisions. This metric provides insight into how much cash flow is available to all funding claimants of the business (be it convertible bond investors, debt holders, and preferred and common stockholders). This is compared to free cash flow to equity (FCFE), which is how much cash flow a business can use if it has zero debt.

While there are many ways to arrive at FCFF, the following is one way to calculate it:

Step 1

Start with Net Operating Profit (NOPAT), which is determined by Earnings Before Interest and Taxes x (1 – Tax Rate)

Step 2

Add Depreciation and Amortization expenses to NOPAT

Step 3

Remove Capital Expenditures

Step 4

Remove Modifications in Net Working Capital

Further Considerations of FCFF Versus FCFE

FCFF assumes there are no payments for interest; nor have any changes in debt been factored in the company’s financial statements. FCFE factors in interest payments and any applicable changes in debt the company may have taken or paid off during the particular accounting time frame. FCFE provides analysts with the ability to determine how efficient a company is and how well (or not) it is at producing cash for equity holders.

Defining NOPAT

NOPAT is a way to see what the company’s operations produce, assuming it has no debt and, accordingly, no outstanding interest expense obligations. It gives analysts and investors an opportunity to look at potential investments with a standardized metric because companies can be seen as having debt and not having debt. It provides easier ability to see if companies can obtain and/or manage debt levels, along with other financial metrics used by investors and analysts.

Along with the already established formula to calculate NOPAT, there’s an alternate formula:

(Net Income + Tax + Interest Expense + Any Non-Operating Gains/Losses] x (1 – Tax Rate)

Operating Earnings = the company’s profits pre interest and taxes (or what the company would earn if it had zero debt, and therefore zero interest expense).

Putting NOPAT in Context

Other important considerations for NOPAT are that it excludes changes in accounts receivable, inventory, accounts payable, and inventory. Additionally, it excludes capital expenditures but accounts for amortization and depreciation.

How NOPAT Assists Analysts and Investors

Businesses can use this data to see how this metric drills down on the business’s core functions. It’s a way to determine how profitable or not a business’ core functions are over shorter and longer time frames. It helps businesses determine how efficient a company is against its competitors since it removes debt and tax comparisons.

Analysis is easier for both businesses looking for acquisitions and for investors. NOPAT helps investors determine which companies are most efficient within their sector based on their main functions. It helps remove the “noise” of debt levels and tax situations.

Looking at these two metrics at face value can seem daunting, but after breaking them down and understanding the differences, it’s easier to see how they aid in financial analysis.

With the number of Amazon Prime member subscribers growing from 58 million in 2016 to 180 million in 2024, according to Statista, there’s a sustained recurring subscription model that one of America’s most successful retailers has increased more than 200 percent in eight years. Whether it’s a large company such as Amazon or a solopreneur beginning their recurring subscription services, it’s important to first distinguish between overall bookings and recurring revenue; and then to illustrate how businesses can measure these two types of revenue.

Dissecting Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR) and Bookings

Bookings are assurances of all anticipated earnings (recurring and one-off deals) because the business hasn’t satisfied the terms of the contracted services. Once it’s completed, the booking will turn into actual revenue. This factor is present in all sales deals, regardless of when revenue or cash will be transferred to the business from the customer. Non-recurring revenue includes training, special consulting projects, etc. (things that are one-off).

Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR) is a way to gauge recurring revenue a business projects to earn on a yearly basis. It’s quite common in eCommerce industries – be it subscriptions for food, software, etc. that are billed on a monthly or annual time frame.

How ARR Helps Businesses Analyze Operations

Businesses can determine demand trends, which help forecast recurring revenue. Lenders and investors can see how (in)efficient a company is with its marketing and sales efforts. It gives business owners and management the ability to determine customer retention and growth prospects while it provides internal and external users the ability to estimate a subscription’s worth. Additional insight businesses can gain from this metric include how much new customers add, how much renewals and upgrades impact ARR, and how churn and downgrades impact ARR.

How to Value a Company Using ARR

One common metric is Enterprise Value divided by ARR (EV/ARR), which is similar but important to distinguish from the EV/Revenue ratio. Since the ARR only factors in recurring revenue versus the EV/Revenue, which factors in all revenue regardless of the revenue recurring, the initial ratio provides a better assessment of the recurring revenue only. Assuming a company has an ARR multiple of 7 and its ARR is $15 million, the ARR has an enterprise value of $105 million.

Monthly Versus Yearly Recurring Revenue

While Monthly Recurring Revenue is not an entry on a business’s financial statements, it’s more of a key performance indicator (KPI). It’s not uncommon for companies to include it as part of their earnings releases. If a recurring subscription revenue is done monthly, it’s converted into Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR) as follows: MRR x 12 = ARR.

Recording Bookings

When a contract is signed, or an order is placed, it depends on how it’s handled. If the business receives cash prior to completing their monthly or yearly service expectation and say the contract is for $20,000 per month for 12 months, it would be recorded as follows:

Debit: Cash $240,000

Credit: Deferred Revenue $240,000

Since the contract has just been signed, but there’s been no product/service rendered, deferred or unearned, revenue has been created.

For every month that passes, the journal entry will progress as follows:

Debit: Deferred Revenue $20,000

Credit: Revenue $20,000

The deferred revenue account drops from $240,000 to $220,000, assuming the starting deferred revenue balance is even and there’s no deferred revenue.

The following month, the journal entries would be as follows:

Debit: Deferred Revenue $20,000

Credit: Revenue $20,000

This would occur every month until the end of the 12-month period.

Conclusion

When it comes to accounting for revenue, whether it’s booked, fulfilled by the company, or the payment received by the company, along with analyzing the time frame, it’s equally important to be familiar with the type of revenue it is for one to see how the company is performing.

A Dec. 3 proposal from FASB’s Accounting Standards Update (ASU) might provide some flexibility for private businesses and select nonprofits. “Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326)” looks at measuring credit losses for contract assets and accounts receivable for these entities.

When it comes to determining projected credit losses for current accounts receivables and current contract assets, businesses face immense resource needs and reporting requirements, including for assets acquired prior to the publication dates of financial statements.

With public comments being received through Jan. 17, 2025, industry professionals have reported that when it comes to gauging projected credit losses for current contract assets and current accounts receivable, there’s a massive undertaking and validation necessary for assets collected prior to financial statement issuance dates. Industry professionals argue that being able to factor in collections post-balance sheet date in calculating expected credit losses would reduce the complexity for preparers, whereas, for third parties, including investors and others who utilize financial statements, it would provide them with valuable data.

FASB proposed an amendment to ASC 326 207 to allow private companies and certain not-for-profit entities to employ a more flexible and efficient way to better gauge their projected credit losses for current contract assets and accounts receivable that originate from transaction accounts under ASC 606.

Working with the Private Company Council (PCC) to look at stakeholders’ concerns that estimating projected credit losses can be exorbitant and complicated for financial proceedings, FASB is soliciting comments on whether or not to expand the scope of entities included for ASU standards, along with different asset classes.

Current Criteria

According to ASC 326-20, when expected credit losses are estimated by entities, an entity must evaluate their ability to garner cash flows via the lens of contemporary economic circumstances, rational and documented projections, and past losses. Past losses may need to be fine-tuned to approximate project credit losses if past circumstances change from present conditions or from well-ground estimates and documented projections. Another consideration when formulating credit loss projections is that entities aren’t required to factor in collections obtained post-balance sheet date.  

Proposed Additions

When it comes to the proposed additions, FASB speaks to a practical expedient and an accounting policy election. The practical expedient concerns an entity’s well-grounded, data-dependent projections. If an entity chooses the practical expedient, it would be able to factor in collection activity beyond the balance sheet date when projecting expected credit losses.

Practical Expedient

To formulate projections that are rational and based on verified accounting details, this so-called practical expedient can be chosen by the entity that assumes its present balance sheet conditions will last for the entire projection time frame. Choosing a practical expedient also implies that an entity’s accounting policy will factor in collection activity past its balance sheet date when gauging expected credit losses. Specifically, under 326-20-30-10C for the practical expedient, during the projection time frame, an entity will maintain the exact circumstances of the balance sheet throughout the rational and data-based projection period.

If a business, for example, has determined a particular client is facing monetary challenges, it would account for its client’s financial issues through projections of estimated expected credit losses for said client, even though it has not impacted the business’ historical loss experience or if the business is up to date as of the balance sheet date.

Accounting Policy Election

Per 326-20-30-10E, when a practical expedient from 326-20-30-10C through 30-10D is chosen by entities for their accounting policy election when projecting credit losses, it signals that the entity factors in collection activity after the balance sheet date, but prior to the date of financial statement issuance. If an entity uses one or both of the practical expedient and/or accounting policy elections, disclosure is mandatory.

Conclusion

Lastly, such advice would be administered on a forward-looking basis, and both of these entities (PCC and FASB) will make the ultimate findings and guidelines of the implementation dates once industry professionals’ comments are considered. However, entities will likely be able to utilize these guidelines sooner.

For eligible companies, these standards could provide greater flexibility and the ability to divert resources to more productive allocations.

Also known as greenhouse gas (GHG) accounting, carbon accounting is a way for managers and analysts to measure a company’s total carbon emissions. 

It’s a comprehensive approach to analyze how a company uses energy for its buildings, offices, conveyances and production processes. Carbon accounting examines firsthand, secondhand and tertiary energy uses.

Environmental, Social & Governance

Looking at ESG standards (Environmental, Social & Governance), it’s not only becoming encouraged, it’s becoming required for businesses, especially for publicly traded businesses. Whether it’s the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) or other governmental agencies in the global economy, these administrative organizations are mandating emission declarations for businesses to account for their carbon emissions. It’s also necessary for third parties (lenders, potential and current investors) to review and analyze a company’s current and past performance, along with industry comparisons.

It’s important to distinguish the differences between carbon and GHG accounting. Carbon accounting only looks at carbon dioxide emissions, while GHG looks at the broader category and illustrates why doing so is important. Businesses look at nitrous oxide and hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), for example, when accounting for GHGs. However, such measurement is based on the so-called carbon dioxide equivalent or C02e. This helps standardize GHGs into the C02e standard for carbon accounting, giving government and interested parties the ability to measure across a universal standard. Two common uses for this standard are for carbon offsets and credits.  

Calculating Emissions

1. Scope 1 factors in emissions from the company’s directly controlled or owned assets. Examples include factories, production, conveyances, etc.  

2. Scope 2 looks at what the business uses in regard to climate-controlled services for their factories, offices, etc. It also looks at the company’s contracts with power suppliers.

3. Scope 3 factors in indirect emissions the business may incur. This includes commercial commuting activities, investing, how assets are disposed of, etc.    

According to the SEC, Scope 3 emissions must include those “upstream and downstream activities in a company’s value chain” if they’re necessary for investor consideration or if the business has pledged to meet certain metrics for Scope 3 levels.

From there, a business’ activity metrics are calculated according to governmental and industry standards, such as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, ISO Standard 14064, or The Climate Registry’s General Reporting Protocol, etc. Businesses’ results are presented against past results, where they discuss how they will improve their efficiency internally and work with their supply chain partners.

Compliance

While compliance is one important reason, third-party audiences, such as family offices, institutional money managers, lenders, etc., are equally as important. Asset managers and family offices, for example, look for ESG or environmentally friendly investments to attract retail or “smart-money” investors. Similarly, activist investors, especially those looking to make companies more environmentally friendly, can look at companies to see how their carbon emissions stack up against their industry and overall commercial peers.

Another consideration is that by meeting regulatory or industry requirements and meeting ESG standards, businesses could qualify for preferential or market rates for funding from the debt markets.

Conclusion

The more companies are well-versed in this type of accounting, the better they will meet government and investor expectations.

Looking at accounting and journal entry considerations, if accounts receivables are debited and revenue is credited, it can be interpreted as the business recognizing revenue without the customer paying. As such, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) sees the potential for intentional manipulation of earnings. It is important to review this type of transaction to see how the U.S. government and accounting standards treat deviations from these activities.

Defining Bill-and-Hold Arrangements

This type of agreement permits sellers to recognize revenue before delivery is made. Instead of shipping the product first, the seller bills the customer first, and delivery is arranged for a future date.

Based upon Accounting Standards Codification (ASC 606-10-55-83) and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), for a customer to have obtained control of a product in a bill-and-hold arrangement, they must meet all of the following in order to move ownership of the product to the customer, with the seller still in custody of it.

• Customers have explicitly asked for such an arrangement. Purchasers have to demonstrate a material reason for buying the goods through this route.
• The goods must be sequestered explicitly for and attributed exclusively to the customer.
• Customers must be able to physically receive the goods.
• The separated goods are expressly prohibited from being used for any other purposes, including those of other customers.
• Purchasers assume all risk.
• There’s a written, fixed commitment to buy the goods.
• The ultimate delivery of goods must be done according to a set timeline that follows realistic commercial uses.
• The finished goods shall be 100 percent finished and be transit prepared.

Illustrating a Bill-and-Hold Arrangement

Companies in commodity-intensive establishments (miners, farmers, etc.) often use heavy equipment to recover and produce outputs. Since a mining or energy company is unsure of the profitability when recovering resources that are price-dependent on dynamic economic conditions, they often enter into a bill-and-hold arrangement with their supplier. Since the steel producer and the drilling company have an existing arrangement with standard terms, there’s an established history of bill-and-hold transactions. If machinery or drilling equipment is fully built for one of these companies, the equipment manufacturer will sequester the equipment and prohibit it from being shipped to any other buyer. Similarly, the invoice for the equipment must be satisfied by the customer in full within 30 days of the equipment being placed and waiting for the resource company buyers. The last step is for the buyer to arrange delivery in a reasonable manner.   

Based on this real-world example, revenue should be recognized once it’s set aside exclusively for a particular mining or natural resource extraction company.

Considerations Beyond the Goods Themselves

Goods producers also must determine if there’s a custodial component during a bill-and-hold arrangement. If a custodial arrangement exists, either part of the original cost of goods sold to the customer needs to be determined or a separate charge, and therefore, exclusive recognition of revenue for the custodial services provided should be addressed outside of the bill-and-hold arrangement.

When it comes to revenue recognition under certain circumstances, goods producers may be able to recognize revenue despite the traditional requirement that goods have left a business, and the seller has materially satisfied their traditional requirement for accounting standards.

With more than 14 million electric vehicle (EV) registrations in 2023 worldwide and 2023 seeing an increase in EV sales over 2022 by 35 percent, manufacturers are probably happy – but not those producing the traditional internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles. This is according to the International Energy Agency’s Global EV Outlook 2024: Trends in Electric Cars.

This statistic is important because it illustrates how assets can be rendered less useful and potentially turn into stranded assets. A stranded asset, defined, is an asset that’s no longer able to provide its owner the profitable payback they originally expected. The difference is based on shifts, primarily negative, that impact the asset’s expected productive performance.

How & Why Assets Become Stranded

When an asset loses its earning power, normally due to extraneous circumstances, like the invention of a more efficient battery, it can become stranded. For example, a machine that’s exclusively capable of making an internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicle can be considered stranded as the transition to electric vehicles (EV) is made. Since the machine is less valuable because it makes fewer and fewer ICE vehicles, it could be impaired or stranded.

This example illustrates that new technology, especially one that moves forward, can render equipment less useful than previously expected. Other ways assets can be stranded include administrative modifications, evolving societal conventions, etc.

Considerations for Stranded Assets by Testing an Asset for Impairment

The primary way to establish if an asset is stranded is to run an impairment test on it. Stranded assets impact the income statement via a non-cash loss, along with impacting the balance sheet by reducing asset value. Therefore, companies must report a loss on the income statement as it’s completely written off the balance sheet.

Whether it’s through the lens of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) or generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), whether an asset is intangible or tangible, when its value issue is less than book value or impaired, it must be written down.

GAAP Standard

The first step is to determine the carrying value. This is calculated by subtracting the accumulated depreciation from the asset’s original cost. From there, the asset’s projected undiscounted future cash flows (UFCF) are analyzed against the asset’s carrying value. If the total UFCF is less than the carrying value, an asset is considered impaired.

IFRS Standard

The first step also looks at an asset’s carrying value. From there, if either of the following two values is lower than the carrying value, it’s considered impaired:

• Present value of future cash flows generated by the asset (the so-called “fair value in use” consideration)
• Fair value less costs to sell the asset

Financial Statement Considerations

If an asset is impaired or stranded, whatever amount the asset drops by, it lowers the business’ asset’s value on the balance sheet. Looking at the income statement, it’s considered a loss. Additionally, since a devaluation is not considered a cash event, it doesn’t trigger any cash outflows. A real-world example can better illustrate this.

The following assumes a business reports its accounting under GAAP. It could be a company that produces fracking equipment to recover natural gas and crude oil. With the uncertainty of domestic fossil fuel policy, specifically where land can be explored, the threat of OPEC and/or Iran being able to determine their production, and the threat of increased government spending on green energy, fracking equipment has a current carrying value of $10 million. However, with increased competition from the three different factors, the same assets can produce an aggregate of $7.5 million in undiscounted future cash flows.

Based on GAAP, since the carrying value is $2.5 million more than the total undiscounted future cash flows, the business would need to record the same amount for an impairment loss. The journal entries would be:

Loss from Impairment Debit:. $2.5 million

Provision for Impairment Losses Credit:  $2.5 million

Conclusion

When it comes to accounting for stranded assets, it’s important to ensure guidelines are followed based on the type of accounting standards businesses must follow.