Author: Service2Client

How to Measure the Quality of Accounts Receivable

4 min read

How to Measure the Quality of Accounts ReceivableAnalyzing a company’s Accounts Receivables is an effective way to measure its current cash flows and the likelihood of maintaining healthy cash flows. According to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce’s Small Business Index (Third Quarter 2024), 68 percent of small business owners reported being content with their third quarter cash flow performance. This illustrates the importance for small business owners to do everything possible to maintain healthy cash flows, including evaluating the quality of accounts receivables (A/R).

Defining Accounts Receivables

This account or line item on the balance sheet gives the business’ managers/owners and investors a measure on how much money a business expects to receive from selling goods or services. It’s an important metric because it’s a measure of what’s owed, but not yet collected from rendered services/goods.

Consideration for Uncollectable Accounts Receivables

While businesses hope to collect 100 percent of their A/Rs, businesses take a realistic view that not everyone will pay up. For whatever reason, A/Rs aren’t always collected and must be accounted for as uncollectable. Therefore, a contra account is setup to account for accounts receivables that turn into bad debt. This contra account is linked to the accounts receivable, an asset reported on the balance sheet, offsetting the accounts receivable balance. However, there are many metrics for companies to manage their health internally, and some of these metrics are discussed below.

Accounts Receivable-to-Sales Ratio

This is determined by taking a “snapshot” of the ratio or division of the accounts receivables divided by sales over a period of time. The resulting calculation is the percentage of a business’ unpaid sales. The higher the accounts receivable-to-sales ratio, the riskier the company’s financial health. It indicates a business has accounts receivables with a low likelihood of being collected. It’s calculated as follows:

AR to Sales = AR / Sales

Since it measures the mix of how much a business relies on cash versus credit, it can prompt an analyst to determine whether a company is able to operate on minimal cash with low fixed costs and limited outstanding debt. It can also prompt an analyst to determine if a company is subject to cyclical sales and is dependent on the business cycle and whether it’s the right time to invest in a company or hold off until a better entry point is established.

Accounts Receivable Turnover Ratio

This calculation determines how fast a business can convert its accounts receivables into cash. It calculates this over a discrete period, be it a month, quarter, year, etc. It’s calculated as the sales over a period divided by the average accounts receivables balance over the same period. It’s calculated as follows:

ARTR = Net Credit Sales / Average Accounts Receivable

Net Credit Sales = Sales on Credit – Sales Returns – Sales Allowances

Average Accounts Receivable = (Starting + Ending A/R Over a Fixed Time) / 2

The higher the ratio, the less friction businesses have in converting their accounts receivables into cash. One important consideration to keep in mind is that if total sales are used for this calculation, which some business do, the results don’t reflect the original formula because it doesn’t remove the sales on credit or sales allowances.

Days Sales Outstanding (DSO)

This metric reveals how fast (in average number of days) a company is able to turn its receivables into cash. It’s the average accounts receivables divided by net credit sales multiplied by 365. It’s calculated as follows:

DSO = (A/R / net credit sales) x 365 days

The lower the DSO, the better quality and the more efficient a company is in converting its accounts receivables into cash. The higher the DSO, and especially when it goes beyond 90 days, can represent two different financial measures. The first is that the business’ accounts receivables might not be collectable. The second is that the company might be able to make sales but with deteriorating earnings.

While there are many ways to analyze a company’s health, along with many ways to analyze the quality of existing and future accounts receivables, these are a few ways to evaluate a company’s present financial health and prospects for the future.

Sources

https://www.uschamber.com/sbindex/key-findings

How to Account for Stranded Assets

4 min read

How to Account for Stranded AssetsWith more than 14 million electric vehicle (EV) registrations in 2023 worldwide and 2023 seeing an increase in EV sales over 2022 by 35 percent, manufacturers are probably happy – but not those producing the traditional internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles. This is according to the International Energy Agency’s Global EV Outlook 2024: Trends in Electric Cars.

This statistic is important because it illustrates how assets can be rendered less useful and potentially turn into stranded assets. A stranded asset, defined, is an asset that’s no longer able to provide its owner the profitable payback they originally expected. The difference is based on shifts, primarily negative, that impact the asset’s expected productive performance.

How & Why Assets Become Stranded

When an asset loses its earning power, normally due to extraneous circumstances, like the invention of a more efficient battery, it can become stranded. For example, a machine that’s exclusively capable of making an internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicle can be considered stranded as the transition to electric vehicles (EV) is made. Since the machine is less valuable because it makes fewer and fewer ICE vehicles, it could be impaired or stranded.

This example illustrates that new technology, especially one that moves forward, can render equipment less useful than previously expected. Other ways assets can be stranded include administrative modifications, evolving societal conventions, etc.

Considerations for Stranded Assets by Testing an Asset for Impairment

The primary way to establish if an asset is stranded is to run an impairment test on it. Stranded assets impact the income statement via a non-cash loss, along with impacting the balance sheet by reducing asset value. Therefore, companies must report a loss on the income statement as it’s completely written off the balance sheet.

Whether it’s through the lens of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) or generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), whether an asset is intangible or tangible, when its value issue is less than book value or impaired, it must be written down.

GAAP Standard

The first step is to determine the carrying value. This is calculated by subtracting the accumulated depreciation from the asset’s original cost. From there, the asset’s projected undiscounted future cash flows (UFCF) are analyzed against the asset’s carrying value. If the total UFCF is less than the carrying value, an asset is considered impaired.

IFRS Standard

The first step also looks at an asset’s carrying value. From there, if either of the following two values is lower than the carrying value, it’s considered impaired:

  • Present value of future cash flows generated by the asset (the so-called “fair value in use” consideration)
  • Fair value less costs to sell the asset

Financial Statement Considerations

If an asset is impaired or stranded, whatever amount the asset drops by, it lowers the business’ asset’s value on the balance sheet. Looking at the income statement, it’s considered a loss. Additionally, since a devaluation is not considered a cash event, it doesn’t trigger any cash outflows. A real-world example can better illustrate this.

The following assumes a business reports its accounting under GAAP. It could be a company that produces fracking equipment to recover natural gas and crude oil. With the uncertainty of domestic fossil fuel policy, specifically where land can be explored, the threat of OPEC and/or Iran being able to determine their production, and the threat of increased government spending on green energy, fracking equipment has a current carrying value of $10 million. However, with increased competition from the three different factors, the same assets can produce an aggregate of $7.5 million in undiscounted future cash flows.

Based on GAAP, since the carrying value is $2.5 million more than the total undiscounted future cash flows, the business would need to record the same amount for an impairment loss. The journal entries would be:

Loss from Impairment Debit:. $2.5 million

Provision for Impairment Losses Credit:  $2.5 million

Conclusion

When it comes to accounting for stranded assets, it’s important to ensure guidelines are followed based on the type of accounting standards businesses must follow.

6 Things To Know About Annuities

4 min read

6 Things To Know About AnnuitiesAnnuities are one of many products that folks have in their nest egg. But first, what exactly is an annuity?

Simply put, it’s a contract with an insurance company that promises to pay the buyer a steady stream of income in the future. It can be either a fixed or variable income stream. The term “annuity” can also refer to a sum of money payable yearly or at other regular intervals.

There are some things to know before you charge headlong into putting your assets into an annuity. So, here are a few watchouts to consider before you head in that direction.

Ask the Right Questions

First up, what kind of annuity is it? What about the fees and optional riders? Is there a Market Value Adjustment, aka MVA? What is the AM Best rating and Comdex rating? How long is the rate guaranteed? How much can you take out penalty-free? How is the gain calculated for index annuities? Is there a surrender charge assessed if I die? How long is the contract term? How is their service? Lots of questions, yes, but the more you ask, the better.

Learn About New Features and Products

Here’s something interesting to ponder: Did you know that 99 percent of index annuities don’t include dividends? Or that 99 percent of index annuities only lock in the rates for 1 to 2 years? In fact, there are new products that include dividends and lock-in rates for the length of the term. Who knew? Here’s a list of the 10 best annuity companies as of September 2024 you might want to check out.

Vet the History of the Company

This is key. For instance, how long have they held their AM Best rating? How long have they been operating under their current name? And finally, did you know that start-ups buy shell companies formed 75+ years ago to advertise they’ve been around since then? Yep, make sure you do your research.

Watch Out for Fees on Variable Annuities

Here’s the thing: Variable annuities have lots of different layers of fees. Make sure you secure an itemized breakdown of all of the fees before you commit. If your variable annuity earns 7 percent to 9 percent gross and you pay 3 percent to 4 percent in fees, you might be better off in a fixed-rate product.

Check Out Long-Term Care Riders

Believe it or not, some annuities offer 200 percent to 300 percent of your initial deposit in long-term care benefits with an optional rider. In fact, long-term care riders on life insurance policies can be more affordable than standalone long-term care policies. However, should you not utilizeyour long-term care benefits, your heirs will get the full death benefit from your life insurance policy, less what you owe on any of your policy loans.

Take a Look at All Types of Annuities

Typically, most banks sell only five to eight annuity companies. So don’t rely on just your bank. If you do, you’ll miss out on 95 percent of the products that are out there. And this is important to know: Lots of insurance agents and “advisors” focus on selling a few index or variable annuities. Make sure you shop around before buying. 

Annuities are just one of many diversified assets you might want to include in your investment portfolio – as you know, diversity is crucial. But when it comes to annuities, there are specific questions and things to think about. Make sure you do your due diligence before you invest.

Sources

11 Annuity Tips You Should Know (annuityresources.org)

Long-Term Care Rider: What It Is, How It Works (investopedia.com)

Zero Trust Security Models: The New Standard Against Data Breaches?

4 min read

Zero Trust Security Models: The New Standard Against Data Breaches?As technology evolves, so have data breaches, which have become a significant threat to businesses of all sizes. We frequently hear reports of high-profile attacks on major organizations, global corporations, and even government agencies. Emerging technologies such as generative artificial intelligence and machine learning make cybersecurity more challenging. They enable cybercriminals to automate attacks, create sophisticated phishing schemes, and develop advanced malware to evade traditional security measures. Hence, companies have no choice but to change how they approach cybersecurity.

To deal with these modern threats, Zero Trust security models are gaining widespread adoption as the preferred standard for effectively protecting against data breaches.

What is Zero Trust?

Zero Trust is a cybersecurity framework based on the “never trust, always verify” principle. Unlike traditional models that grant access based on network location, Zero Trust requires continuous verification of each user, device, and application attempting to access resources.

Instead of assuming that someone within the network can be trusted, Zero Trust demands constant authentication and least-privilege access. This means users are granted access to only the data and resources they need to perform their tasks. Basically, every interaction is assumed to be a breach.

How Zero Trust Differs from Traditional Security Models

Historically, businesses operated on a “perimeter-based” approach – trusting everything inside their network and guarding against threats from the outside. However, the once-clear network boundary has become unclear with the rise in remote work, cloud computing, and mobile devices. Breaches today can occur internally, often by compromised accounts, rogue insiders, or lateral movement of malware.

Cyberthreats have become such a huge problem that the U.S. government issued an executive order to help improve the nation’s cyber security by mandating that federal agencies adopt the Zero Trust architecture. This further pushes businesses to rethink their cybersecurity strategies.

Key Components of a Zero Trust Model

Zero Trust models are built on several core principles:

  • Continuous verification – Authentication is ongoing, requiring verification for every request made by a user or device.
  • Least-privilege access – Users receive only the minimum level of access needed to perform their jobs.
  • Micro-segmentation – Networks are divided into smaller zones, limiting the lateral movement of potential threats.
  • Contextual monitoring – Continuous monitoring of users and devices based on context – such as location, device health, and behavior – to identify abnormal activities.
  • Multi-factor authentication (MFA) – MFA requires users to provide two or more forms of authentication, such as a password combined with a biometric factor or a security token.
  • Encryption – All data must be encrypted to protect it from unauthorized access or interception. Encryption ensures that even if attackers manage to capture data, they cannot read or exploit it without the appropriate decryption keys.
  • Access Controls – Applying strict policies to determine who can access specific data and systems based on their role and identity.

Benefits of Zero Trust

  1. Stronger protection against data breaches – Zero Trust models significantly reduce the risk of data breaches by enforcing strict identity verification and limiting access to only necessary resources. Even if an attacker gains entry, micro-segmentation ensures limited movement, containing threats, and minimizing damage.
  2. Enhanced regulatory compliance – Zero Trust helps businesses meet regulatory requirements like GDPR and HIPAA by enforcing strict access controls and continuous monitoring. This approach simplifies compliance and ensures that only authorized users can access sensitive data, reducing the risk of fines.
  3. Improved visibility and control – With continuous monitoring, Zero Trust provides better visibility into network activity, making detecting suspicious behavior in real-time easier. This added control enhances security and operational efficiency, allowing immediate responses to potential threats.
  4. Reduction of insider threats – Zero Trust minimizes insider threats by requiring strict identity verification and limiting access, even for internal users. This makes it harder for malicious insiders or compromised accounts to cause significant damage within the network.
  5. Support for remote work and cloud environments – Zero Trust offers safe access to resources from any location. This flexibility ensures that businesses maintain strong security for both in-office and remote teams.

Conclusion

Zero Trust security models represent a significant shift from traditional perimeter-based defenses to a more dynamic and resilient approach. For business owners, adopting Zero Trust principles can provide peace of mind and enhanced protection in today’s unpredictable cyber landscape. With time, emerging technologies like artificial intelligence, IoT, and cloud computing will continue to shape the evolution of Zero Trust, making it an essential part of a robust cybersecurity strategy.

The New Era of “No Tax” Policies: Selective Tax Exemptions and Their Side Effects

4 min read

No Tax on Tips, No Tax on Over TimeFormer President and current candidate Donald Trump introduced a new policy of his in a recent Arizona rally: No more income tax on overtime pay. This follows both Trump and Vice President Harris’ proposal for a no income tax on tips policy, as well.

Below we will look at the two recent proposals and what they could mean for both taxpayers and businesses.

No Tax on Tips

The no tax on tips policy looks to lighten the tax burden on service industry workers. According to the Fair Labor and Standards Act, anyone who “customarily and regularly” receives $30 or more in tips per month is considered a tipped worker. The mechanism to exempt tip income could possibly come through three different mechanisms.

One option would be to categorize tips as gifts. Service employees are often paid wages lower than the minimum wage (as low as $2.31 per hour), with employers required to “top-up” an employee to the federal minimum wage of $7.25 if tips don’t at least make up the difference themselves. As a result, considering tips as gifts may not legally work.

A second option is to treat a specified amount of tips as non-taxable income. Consider a policy, for example, in which up to $25,000 in tips is treated as non-taxable income. Legally, this is straightforward, but it could have various knock-off effects on those it is intended to help. For example, a taxpayer’s gross income could fall so low they no longer qualify for the earned income tax credit and end up being a net negative.

Finally, there is a third option of creating a new deduction; allowing taxpayers to first claim the income and then take a deduction to offset it. The issue here is that given the claimed income level of most tipped workers, an additional deduction may not be one-for-one incrementally beneficial to the standard deduction. In other words, so much of their income is already non-taxable, this wouldn’t make much of a difference.

Side-Effects

Depending on how the policy is structured, there are negative side effects that could accompany the policy change. Compliance with reporting tip income is already spotty at best. It’s not uncommon for tipped workers to underreport their tip income, especially for cash tips. The main concern is that employers and employees may try to game the system. There is a real chance that who is tipped changes and people may try to change compensation schemes so that other types of income are then changed to tip income to take advantage of the changes; especially for taxpayers for whom the law was never intended to help.

Non-Taxable Overtime

The second proposal is to exempt overtime wages from income taxation. The idea is that it would help workers who get to keep more of their money; and at the same time helping businesses, since employees would be incentivized to work more hours, thereby negating the need to hire more employees. While on the surface it seems like a policy to help the hardest working, there are potential problems.

Unfair to Regular Wage Earners

There are two possible issues. First, it leaves behind hourly workers who cannot work overtime due to other responsibilities, health or their job’s duties. It also disadvantages those who have to work multiple jobs (because their job doesn’t offer overtime, but they need the money).

Second, it doesn’t consider salaried positions. There are many salaried positions, where workers are exempt from overtime laws – and a large swath of these are not highly paid positions.

Administrative Complications

Employers and the IRS would need to deal with distinguishing between regular wages and overtime earnings. What is considered overtime is not always clear when there are pay concepts such as bonuses, shift differentials, commissions or other alternative payment arrangements. It would also add significant complexity to payroll systems.

Conclusion

While both policies are well intended, the devil is in the details. Implementation would need to be carefully considered; the intended taxpayers might not be the main beneficiaries; and there is room for fraud.

Keeping the Government Open, Stopping the Flow of Synthetic Drugs, and Improving Wireless Communications on Land and in Space

4 min read

Keeping the Government Open, Stopping the Flow of Synthetic Drugs, and Improving Wireless Communications on Land and in SpaceContinuing Appropriations and Extensions Act, 2025 (HR 9747) – This continuing resolution was introduced on Sept. 22 as a “clean” extenuation of the federal budget to fund the government until Dec. 20. Up until this point, a handful of Republicans had attached unrelated bills pertaining to November election restrictions, which they did not have the votes to pass in the House and would never have passed in the Senate. After several weeks of threatening to shut down the government by not passing a continuing appropriations bill, the House Speaker proposed this “last-minute” tied over with the minimum appropriations necessary to keep the government up and running. While it still does not solidify the federal budget for the 2025 fiscal year (Sept. 29, 2024, through Sept. 27, 2025), this bill is expected to pass in the House on Sept. 25 and to clear the Senate and be signed by the president by Sept. 29.

Preventing the Financing of Illegal Synthetic Drugs Act (HR 1076) – Introduced by Rep. Mónica De La Cruz (R-TX) on Feb. 17, 2023, this bill directs the Government Accountability Office to conduct a study on illegal funding sources related to the trafficking of synthetic drugs such fentanyl and methamphetamine. The bill passed in the House on May 22, 2023, in the Senate on July 23, 2024, and was signed into law by the president on Sept. 13.

Launch Communications Act (S 1648) – This act will update ground-to-space rocket communications going forward. Presently, commercial missions are required to use the government-owned spectrum to communicate during launches, including special temporary authority for private companies. This bill permits the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to facilitate seamless access to broadband spectrum frequencies for commercial space launches and re-entries. The bill, which was introduced on May 17, 2023, by Sen. Eric Schmitt (R-MO), passed unanimously in the Senate on Oct. 21, 2023, and in the House on Sept. 17. It is currently awaiting signature by the president for enactment.

FUTURE Networks Act (HR 1513) – The acronym stands for Future Uses of Technology Upholding Reliable and Enhanced Networks Act. Introduced by Doris Matsui (D-CA) on March 9, 2023, this act would instruct the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to establish a 6G Task Force comprised of private, academic and government experts to monitor the status of sixth-generation wireless technology, including its possible uses. The House passed the bill on Sept. 18, and the bill now rests with the Senate.

Violence Against Women by Illegal Aliens Act (HR 7909) – This bill would amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to make non-U.S. nationals (aliens) convicted of or having admitted to committing sex offenses or domestic violence (including conspiracy to commit a sex offense) be ineligible for country admission and deportable. Introduced by Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC), the bill passed in the House on Sept. 18 and currently lies in the Senate.

Intergovernmental Critical Minerals Task Force Act (S 1871) – Introduced by Sen. Gary Peters (D-MI) on June 8, 2023, this bill would enable coordination among state, local, tribal and territorial jurisdictions with the federal government to mitigate national security risks related to the current U.S. critical mineral supply chains. Specifically, the intent is to make the United States less reliant on China and other countries for critical minerals and rare earth metals. Provisions of the bill allow for development, mining and strengthening of our domestic workforce and to improve partnerships with allied countries for dependable mineral supply chains. The bill passed in the Senate on Sept. 8 and is currently with the House.

SMART Leasing Act (S 211) – Introduced on Feb. 1, 2023, by Sen. Gary Peters (D-MI), this bill would launch a program to lease underutilized properties owned by the federal government. The net funding would then be used for capital projects and to help offset the national deficit. The act passed in the Senate on Aug. 1 and is currently under consideration in the House.

U.S. Flag Mandate, Combatting Deepfake Pornography and Legislative Priorities of the Vice President Nominees in 2024 Election

1 min read

U.S. Flag Mandate, Combatting Deepfake Pornography and Legislative Priorities of the Vice President Nominees in 2024 ElectionAll American Flag Act (S 1973) – Introduced by Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-OH) on June 14, 2023, this bill requires that all U.S. flags used by the Federal government be manufactured domestically. This includes all raw materials. One exception to this mandate is if flags cannot be produced of acceptable quality and quantity as needed at competitive market prices. The bill passed in the Senate on Nov. 2, 2023, in the House on July 22, and was signed into law by the president on July 30.

Disrupt Explicit Forged Images and Non-Consensual Edits Act of 2024 (S 3696) – This bipartisan bill, also known as the DEFIANCE Act, is designed to protect victims of deepfake pornography. It defines civil action as a federal remedy for non-consensual parties who are identifiable in digital forgeries and depicted as nude or engaging in sexually explicit conduct. The bill, which was introduced on Jan. 30 by Sen. Richard Durbin (D-IL), passed unanimously in the Senate on July 23. It goes to the House next, where a similar bill has been introduced.

 

Congress is not in session Aug. 5-30, as members return to their districts. 

7 Reasons You Need a Will

4 min read

7 Reasons You Need a WillDrafting a will is not something that people, for the most part, want to think about. But no one gets out of life alive. So, if you want to have a say in what happens to your property and assets after you’re gone, a will is a very smart idea. Here are a few specific reasons why having a will makes good sense.

Facilitates Probate

First, a definition: Probate is the legal procedure your estate goes through after you pass. During this process, a court will start the process of distributing your estate to those you designate. When you have a will, the probate process has a legal document as a guide, one the court uses that clearly defines your wishes. This way, there are fewer roadblocks. Things go a lot more smoothly.

Protects Your Estate

Now, if you don’t have a will, there’s no binding legal document that espouses what you want to do with your assets. Instead, the probate court will distribute your estate according to your state’s intestacy laws. There’s no guarantee that the state agrees with what you want.

Designates Who Gets What

This is one of the most important. If your family includes ex-spouses and/or estranged relatives, having a will helps prevent squabbles. An unhappy relative will think twice about protesting when you have a well-drafted will.

Disinherits People, Too

If you don’t have a will, again, probate courts will distribute your estate based on your state’s intestacy laws, which create a hierarchy of inheritance among your surviving family members. Because families – and life – can be messy, when you have a will, you can specify who doesn’t get parts of your estate. Better still, you can even specify certain people to receive your assets as beneficiaries, who aren’t necessarily relatives. When you’re this specific within a legal document, it can further safeguard your wishes.

Provides For Your Children and Pets

When you have a will, it gives you the power to decide who will care for your children if they’re minors when you pass. If you don’t decide, a court will appoint a guardian. It’s safe to say that most people don’t want this; you know your children best. Since pets are considered property and they can’t inherit, you can make sure your beloved furry family members are adopted by a person or organization that you know and trust.

Specifies the Executor and Administrator of Your Estate

You get to decide who these people are, though sometimes they can be the same person. Generally, their function is to make sure your beneficiaries receive the assets you’ve designated for them. Having these trusted people in place will give you peace of mind. When you don’t have these individuals in place, you give up the control you could have had.

Helps Minimize Estate Taxes

Yes, it’s true. Your family, should they inherit property from you after you’re gone, might have to pay taxes on it. That’s why it pays to look into estate planning tools. When you have a will, you can build these stipulations into it. Just ask your accountant and/or lawyer to help you navigate these waters. It’s well worth it.

These are just a few of the reasons you need a will. Probably the main reason is that tomorrow isn’t guaranteed. When you’re gone, you’ve missed your opportunity to legally draft your final desires. That’s why, when you’ve set up provisions for all the things you’ve worked so hard for and all the people you leave behind, it’s truly an act of love.

 

Sources

Top 10 Reasons to Have a Will (findlaw.com)

Executor vs. Administrator: What’s the Difference? – Policygenius

Probate – What Is Probate & How To Avoid It | Trust & Will (trustandwill.com)

 

Looking at the Expanded Accounting Equation

3 min read

Expanded Accounting EquationWhether it’s a private equity transaction or an institutional or retail investor, analyzing a company’s financial statements is an important part of fundamental analysis. One important but basic way to analyze whether a company is worth investing in is through the expanded accounting equation. The most straightforward equation to analyze a business’s balance sheet is:

Assets = Liabilities + Shareholder’s Equity

However, there are more detailed equations that analysts can employ to more closely examine a company’s financial situation. One way to look at it is by more comprehensive equations that break down net income and the transactions related to the equity owners (dividends, etc.).

This equation is a building block of accounting because it focuses on double-entry accounting – or that each occurrence impacts the bifurcated accounting equation – requiring the correct solution to always be in balance. This system is used for journal entries, regardless of the type of transaction. Looking at this equation in greater detail, here’s a more granular example:

Assets = Retained Earnings + Liabilities + Share Capital

Assets are the capital that give a business the ability to benefit from projected, increased productivity and hopefully increased gains. Whether it’s short-term (less than 12 months) or long-term (more than 12 months), it can take the form of real estate, cash, cash-equivalents, pre-paid expenses, accounts receivable, etc.

Liabilities are the amounts owed to lenders due to past agreements. This is related to the sum of liabilities, which is the total of current (up to 12 months) liabilities, plus long-term (more than 12 months) debt and related obligations. This takes the form of loans, accounts payable, owed taxes, etc. Shareholder’s equity is how much the company owners may assert ownership on after accounting for all liabilities.

Another way this equation can be expressed is as follows:

Assets = Liabilities + Contributed Capital + Beginning Retained Earnings + Revenue + Expenses + Dividends

Depending on the financial outcome of the company, dividends and expenses may be negative numbers.

To further explain, these variations on the equation help analysts break down shareholder’s equity. Revenues and expenses illustrate the delta in net income over discrete accounting/earning periods from sales and costs, respectively. Stockholder transactions are able to be accounted for by looking at what capital the original stockholders provided to the business and dividends, or earnings distributed to the company’s stockholders. Retained earnings are carried over from a prior accounting period to the present accounting period. Despite being elementary, the information is helpful for business managers and investors to develop a higher level of analysis.

When it comes to evaluating bankruptcy, it can help investors determine the likelihood of receiving compensation. When it comes to liabilities, should debts be due sooner or over longer periods of time, these debts always have priority. When it comes to liquidated assets, these are then used to satisfy shareholders’ equity until funds are exhausted.  

While this is not a comprehensive look at how to analyze a company, it provides internal and external stakeholders with a way to build a strong financial analytical foundation.

Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments

4 min read

Convertible Debt InstrumentsAccording to EY, the convertible debt market saw whipsaw action in issuances. Between 2015 and 2019, average issuance varied between $40 billion and $45 billion. However, it dropped to $22 billion in 2022 but re-accelerated to $52 billion in 2023. While the levels of issuance varied, the way this type of debt is accounted for has remained much calmer.

Defining a Convertible Bond

A convertible bond is a type of debt security that gives the investor the right to exchange the bond, at certain milestones, for a pre-determined percentage of equity in the issuing company. This investment vehicle has both equity and debt features.

Since this type of investment gives investors the potential for equity conversion into a company, the debt/bond side of it may present investors with a nominal coupon remittance or a potentially zero-coupon payment. However, there are important accounting considerations for this type of investment vehicle via generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS).

IFRS

When it comes to IFRS, convertible bonds are considered blended securities because they are partially debt and partially equity. The debt piece is accounted for by discounting the principal and interest paid out to the bondholder at the company’s cost of straight debt. The following example illustrates how it’s calculated:

The business presents a 10-year, $250 million convertible bond, providing investors with a 2.5 percent coupon rate and a 9.5 percent straight cost of debt. Based on discounting these variables, the present value of the principal and coupon payments is: $182,805,096 (assuming end-of-year, annual coupons). To determine the equity proportion, we must take $250 million and subtract $182,805,096, which equals $67,194,904.

Looking at the journal entry, we have the following breakdown:

Cash: Debit $250,000,000

Convertible Debt Component – Liability = $182,805,096

Equity Component – Shareholder’s Equity = $67,194,904

Looking at the interest expense this is calculated as follows:

The 9.5 percent (straight debt cost) is multiplied by the net present value of the beginning debt liability balance of the first year ($182,805,096), which is $17,366,484.12. Since there’s a coupon payment of (2.5 percent X $250,000,000 = $6,250,000), the difference between $17,366,484.12 and $6,250,000 = $11,116,484.12 should be “accreted” to the debt liability or the debt balance.

The journal entry would be as follows:

Debit: Interest Expense $17,366,484.12

Credit: Cash $6,250,000

Credit: Accretion of Debt Discount – Liability = $11,116,484.12

Now, if at the bond’s maturity, the investor is unable to convert the bond to equity according to the terms of the convertible note, the entire $250 million bond will be paid back to the investor. The journal entry will be as follows:

Debit: Convertible Debt $250,000,000

Credit: Cash $250,000,000

If, however, the investor of the convertible bond is favorable to it being exchanged, the journal entry will be as follows:

Debit: Convertible Debt $250,000,000

Credit: Share Capital – Shareholder’s Equity = $250,000,000

This explanation assumes that convertible bonds are only able to be converted into company equity. However, if the bond is cash-settled, there are alternate considerations. It’s also assumed that the bond is issued at year’s end and makes its coupon payments once a year.

GAAP

Under generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), present standards treat it as straight debt. This accounting practice changed from GAAP’s previous treatment of bifurcating it, similar to IFRS’ current treatment.

At issuance, the journal entries are as follows:

Debit: Cash $250,000,000

Credit: Convertible Debt $250,000,000

With this accounting treatment, it’s recognized as an interest expense. Since this contrasts with IFRS, no accretion is required under GAAP. This assumes there are no additional debt issuance costs when calculating interest expenses. Therefore, assuming the same initial debt amount at par and the coupon rate for year one, it’s the rate for the debt issuance multiplied by the full debt amount ($250,000,000).

The journal entry is as follows:

Debit: Interest Expense $6,250,000

Credit: Cash $6,250,000

If the convertible debt doesn’t present a good opportunity for the investor, they’ll receive the principal back. The journal entry is as follows:

Debit: Convertible Debt $250,000,000

Credit: Cash $250,000,000

If, however, the convertible debt presents the investor with an opportunity to convert to equity, and it’s exercised, the journal entry is presented as follows:

 Debit: Convertible Debt $250,000,000

 Credit: Share Capital – Shareholder’s Equity $250,000,000

Conclusion

While these examples do not explore all the potential scenarios when accounting for convertible debt, they show what considerations accountants must keep in mind when analyzing a transaction.