Category: General Business News

Liquidity looks at how well a company can handle paying wages, inventory, and lending repayments via measuring its cash or quasi-cash levels. Put another way, it looks at the health of a company’s cash flow to satisfy short-term financial obligations.

It’s important to be mindful of different sectors and what’s normal or healthy based on the time of year. For example, retail and manufacturing feature functionally focused companies, which means seasonality impacts their dynamic working capital requirements.

1. Current Ratio

The current ratio looks at the ratio of current assets divided by current liabilities. It measures how well a company is projected to pay its present obligations. If the result is 1.0 to 3.0, it’s considered financially well. However, if it’s higher than 3.0, suboptimal asset utilization may be incurred by the company, with a lower than industry average suggesting financial concern. It’s calculated as follows:

Current Ratio = Current Assets/Current Liabilities

The resulting current ratio can signal many things. For a growing current ratio, debt could be growing or cash levels falling. When the current ratio is falling, but not too low, and it’s a smooth downward trend, it can indicate the company is getting more efficient at moving inventory, collecting invoices, and reducing debt levels.

2. Quick Ratio or Acid Test

This is determined by taking the current assets and deducting inventory from them. Once that’s calculated, that number is divided by current liabilities. By looking at the business’ on-demand liquid assets without factoring in inventory, it’s calculated as follows:

Quick Ratio or Acid Test = (Current Assets – Inventory)/Current Liabilities

Resulting calculations above or equal to 1.0 show a company’s stable short-term fiscal health. It’s important to be mindful that a very high result can indicate there’s idle cash that’s not being reinvested, distributed to shareholders, or otherwise put to better use.

Defining Solvency

Solvency refers to the ability of a business’ complete assets to satisfy its complete long-term financial obligations and loan repayments. It’s especially helpful when the business is analyzed internally or externally to determine if the business can survive and thrive during challenging economic times (industry-specific or macro challenges). It helps determine the company’s creditworthiness, whether it’s a good bet for an investment, and/or the risk for companies to take on additional debt. It looks at not only the debt on the company’s financial statements, but also how it relates to equity, tangible assets, and EBITDA.

Debt to Equity

This measures how a company relies on debt versus its equity. It’s used when comparing one company against its industry competitors and how the company’s own ratio has trended over time. Looking at companies within the same industry, companies with a higher ratio indicate a riskier financial situation. Similarly, a ratio that’s too low can indicate a business not using debt to expand its operations effectively.

While liquidity and solvency are different, they are complementary for both owners and managers, along with external parties such as investors analyzing for the next potential investment.

The goodwill to assets ratio measures how much of a company’s total assets come from goodwill – an intangible asset like brand value or customer loyalty – and it plays a role in assessing the company’s overall value. It provides a ratio or percentage of the amount of intangible versus tangible assets. Understanding what the ratio represents, how it is calculated, and how to interpret it is essential for effectively applying it to business operations and investment decisions.

Goodwill Defined

Goodwill can be defined as an intangible asset that comes about when the acquiring firm obtains such assets from the acquired firm at a higher value. When it comes to accounting standards, both International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), intangible assets must be evaluated for impairment, but don’t need to be amortized. Based upon IFRS 38, goodwill is generated solely during an acquisition and is defined as the amount of the acquisition price for the acquired company over its book value. IFRS 38 does not recognize goodwill generated by the company internally.

Calculating Goodwill

Goodwill = Liabilities – Assets + Purchase Price

If a company looks at acquiring another company for $750,000, and the company being acquired has assets of $900,000 and liabilities of $450,000, the net assets would be $450,000. Based on the goodwill formula:

Goodwill = $450,000 – $900,000 + $750,000 = $300,000

Once the goodwill has been established, the Goodwill to Assets Ratio Formula is used as follows:

Goodwill to Assets Ratio = Unamortized Goodwill / Total Assets

If one company is putting itself up for sale with a selling price of $75 million, it would have to establish its book value, based on recent financial statements, along with its goodwill value. Factors that go into calculating a company’s goodwill include if the company has prime real estate, a well-known brand, a rich list of clients, or intellectual property that sets itself apart from competitors in the industry that won’t expire for years. For example, if its intangible assets are $15 million, subtracted from its selling price of $75 million, its tangible assets or book value would be $60 million.

Based on the ratio, it’s calculated as follows:

$15 million / $75 million = 20 percent

Therefore, the ratio is 20 percent for the company’s goodwill as part of the company’s valuation. Otherwise, if the purchase goes through, whoever buys the company spends 20 percent on the company’s goodwill.

Analyzing the Goodwill to Assets Ratio

This ratio gives an overview of a business’s financial health. The lower the ratio, the more tangible or physical assets that can be sold. Conversely, the higher the ratio, the fewer intangibles a company has. Much like assets that can be written down, so can a company’s goodwill.

This ratio is not one-in-all and should be measured against businesses within the same industry. Based on this analysis, if a company has a large amount of goodwill on its financial statements, if it’s written down, it could still result in a lower valuation despite the company having a large amount of assets.

Looking over time, it shows the importance of ongoing evaluations. In 1975, according to the University of California, Los Angeles, companies on the Standard and Poor’s 500 (S&P 500) had $122 billion of intangible assets and $594 billion of tangible assets, or about a 21 percent intangible to tangible assets ratio. These companies included most industrial and energy sector names like GE, Procter & Gamble, 3M, Exxon Mobil, along with IBM, based on market capitalization. However, in 2018, the ratio increased to 84 percent of intangible to tangible assets. Intangible assets accounted for $21.03 trillion and $4 trillion when looking at most of the companies on the S&P 500, which included Apple, Alphabet, Microsoft, Amazon, and Facebook, based on market capitalization.

While the growth of technology and communication services has risen and skewed the tangible to intangible ratio, it shows the importance of evaluating companies and sectors individually, not just with a broad brush.

Sources

Boom of Intangible Assets Felt Across Industries and Economy

When it comes to the risk of default, Moody’s found that during COVID-19, American businesses had a 7.8 percent chance of defaulting. This is compared to a low of 4 percent in 2021, but lower than the current 9.2 percent risk of default, according to a March 2025 report by the rating agency.

Also known as cash flow available for debt service, CFADS determines how much cash is available to service debt obligations. It looks at different cash inflows/outflows to show both internal (owners and managers) and external audiences (investors) how efficient (or not) a business is in its ability to produce cash flows and manage its debts without defaulting.

While one method businesses use is balancing client sales, it is also common to look at various accounting entries, including Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA). The results of CFADS are often used by financial analysts when creating coverage ratios, including the project life coverage ratio (PLCR), the debt service coverage ratio (DSCR), and the loan life coverage ratio (LLCR). It can sometimes take the place of EBITDA in certain circumstances. It’s important to note that the three coverage ratios show how well a plan is able to service and not default on debt throughout the entire project’s period.

For example, the DSCR = CFADS / Scheduled Debt Service (Interest + Principal Obligations)

Once this is calculated based on the company’s project specifications, if the result is greater than 1, then it signifies and gives greater confidence to internal and external audiences that the company will be able to meet its milestones and final payments.

The most efficient formula for calculating CFADS is as follows:

EBITDA – Taxes – Positive or Negative Result of Working Capital – Capital Expenditures for Maintenance Only

$200,000 (EBITDA) – $30,000 (Taxes) + $20,000 (assuming there’s a negative $20,000 change in working capital) – $40,000 (assuming the capital expenditure investing in maintenance)

CFADS = $150,000

Sometimes the calculation includes dividends, which need to be factored into the calculation. This example assumes it is not part of the calculation.

Interpreting Results

It’s important to understand that a more detailed analysis helps all audiences determine if the projected cash flow is available for different claimants of the business. While most of the calculations are done via the waterfall model, it’s important to analyze it based upon senior and junior debt, along with equity. If a company declares bankruptcy, senior debt holders are the first priority to be made whole (or as whole as possible, depending on the circumstances). Senior debt is collateralized or secured with company assets that are sold off during bankruptcy. From there, junior debt holders are next in line, followed by convertible note holders, then preferred stockholders, and finally common stockholders.

While this calculation is only one part of the way internal and external stakeholders can measure a company’s financial health, with the chance of more firms defaulting on debt, it’s another tool in a financial analyst’s toolbox.

When it comes to analyzing a company’s financials, there are many avenues we can take. One way is through multiples; calculating the EV/2P multiple is the focus of this analysis.

This ratio looks at a business’ enterprise value against its proven and probable 2P reserves. While ratios or multiples are used in valuing companies, this metric is used chiefly to value gas and oil companies for energy sector analysts. Analysts use this calculation to determine the likelihood that a company’s reserve resources can underpin its functioning and expansion efforts. Along with the ratio, analysts use micro and macro factors to determine a company’s financial health, its growth prospects, and whether the business is undervalued or overvalued.

This multiple is similar in comparison to other valuation multiples such as Price-to-Book (P/B), Price-to-Earnings (PE), Enterprise Value/Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization. While these other metrics can also value an oil or gas company, understanding how it’s calculated is essential to why it is sector specific.  

Breaking Down the EV/2P Ratio

EV = Market Value of Equity + Market Value of Debt – Cash and Cash Equivalents

It’s determined by the complete market worth asserted by the bond and equity holders (net of cash).

2P = Proven Reserves + Probable Reserves

The reserves of a company give analysts and investors an idea of the likelihood of the recoverability of reserves being produced and assisting the company’s growth. Proven reserves, often denoted as “P1” or “P90,” are rated at a 90 percent chance of recovering successfully. Probable reserves, also called “P50,” have a 1-in-2 chance of recovering. Both reserve types and their likelihood of being recovered are, therefore, referred to as 2P.  

It’s important to note a third category referred to as “possible reserves.” This category is not factored into the company’s valuation because the 10 percent to 50 percent likelihood of reserve recoverability is too low.  

Example

Illustrating how it’s calculated gives a more complete picture of how to analyze the results. For example, say a business‘ market capitalization is $200 million with a net debt of $100 million, giving it an enterprise value of $300 million. Assuming the company has $10 million of probable reserves, $20 million of proven reserves, and $15 million of possible reserves, the calculation is as follows:

EV = $300 million ($200 million + $100 million)

2P reserves = $30 million ($10 million + $20 million)

Therefore, $300 million/$30 million = $10

Every dollar of its market capitalization is worth $10 based on its 2P reserves. Once the calculation is determined, the ratio of the EV/2P is measured against the energy sector’s average ratio. The higher the EV/2P ratio, especially against its peers, the higher valuation the company has compared to other companies with the same amount of 2P reserves. The company’s shares are sold at a higher multiple than other companies.

It’s important to keep in mind that if a company’s financials are stronger or it’s more efficient and provides a better prospect for investors against its peers, its lofty valuation may be justified. It’s also important to not look at valuing companies exclusively with this ratio/multiple but also review other metrics and the macro-economic conditions before making a final investment decision.

While this multiple is primarily used for the energy industry, those who use it should be mindful to not analyze a company in that lens only, but to use a holistic analysis when valuing any type of company.

The subscription economy, according to Forbes, is expected to reach $1.5 trillion in revenue for businesses. With the potential likely realized this year, it’s vital to understand how it is tracked – and more importantly, how it’s able to be tracked on a separate basis.

Also known as net dollar retention (NDR), this metric calculates the proportion of recurring revenue kept from present clients, including upsells and churn, during a defined time frame. Net revenue retention (NRR) evaluates a business’s potential to keep and increase sales from their present clients.

It looks at how well a company leverages existing customer relationships to increase sales through add-ons, complimentary services, etc. It focuses on the long-term growth of recurring revenue from these relationships. It’s calculated as follows:

NRR = (Starting MRR + Expansion MRR – Churn MRR) ÷ Starting MRR

Based on the following assumptions:

Starting monthly recurring revenue: $200,000

Expansion monthly recurring revenue: $40,000

Churn monthly recurring revenue: $20,000

NRR = ($200,000 + $40,000 – $20,000) / $200,000 = 1.10 or 110%

Based on this result, the company is increasing its revenue from existing customers faster than it’s failing to keep revenue from customer churn, an important metric showing growth.

The following factors impact the formula:

Starting MRR is also referred to as the baseline recurring revenue.

Expansion MRR refers to the added sales from newly added clients, upselling, upgrades, and additions to existing customers’ services.

Churn MRR is the sales missed by customers who stopped or lowered their level and type of services with the company.

Defining a Healthy Revenue Retention Rate

Companies that have a score of more than 100 percent show they’re bringing in more revenue from the existing customer base versus what the company is losing from customer churn. If, however, it’s less than 100 percent, customer satisfaction might be lacking, and customers may either be lost or simply not interested in additional services. Since acquiring new customers is more expensive than keeping current ones, it can lead to reflection on how to improve retention rates.

Journal Entry for Recurring Revenue

Assuming there’s a 12-month contract signed for monthly services, the journal entry would be as follows for a $1,000/monthly payment for a total of $12,000.

Once the $1,000 subscription income has been earned, the following journal entry would be entered.

While each industry and business are different, using this metric can help companies determine if there’s a customer retention problem; then they can start the investigation on how to increase retention for the future.

Sources

https://www.forbes.com/councils/forbesfinancecouncil/2023/10/27/the-truth-about-recurring-revenue/

Return on Ad Spend (ROAS) is one way to help advertising and marketing professionals and investors analyze how well promotions do (or don’t) produce sales. It helps advertisers develop data based on their campaigns’ revenue production (or lack thereof). Understanding how this metric is calculated and how to analyze ROAS is essential for businesses to monitor and increase their advertising performance.

Known as a Key Performance Indicator (KPI), ROAS determines how much sales are generated per dollar invested on advertising outlays. It separates advertising costs from the company’s costs, and it focuses on:

1. The differences between advertising income and advertisement expenses

2. Assisting companies with creating efficient budgets

3. Identifying unprofitable campaigns

How ROAS is calculated:

Return on Ad Spend (ROAS) = Revenue generated from ad campaign/Total advertising costs for a specific campaign

The revenue generated from an ad campaign is the revenue immediately assignable to promotions utilizing a tracking tool.

Total advertising costs for a specific campaign are expenses explicitly connected to the advertising platform.

The resulting calculation determines the business’ return on ad spend, giving owners and managers an idea of how well (or not) ad spending impacts the company’s sales. It similarly enables business owners to reconcile the company’s budgeted advertising costs against growing sales metrics. The following hypothetical breakdown shows what a positive scenario looks like:

A ROAS of 10 = $10 of revenue was earned for every $1 spent on ads. This would translate into:

Total Ad Spend: $10,000

Revenue Generated: $100,000

ROAS = $10

ROAS = 10:1

Important considerations when calculating this include factoring in merchant expenses, costs for digital content production, and costs incurred from media platforms. It’s also important to consider that it’s not always cut-and-dry as to how and what specific ads convert potential customers into paying customers. Assigning the exact ad platform or campaign is a common problem when determining the exact ROAS.

Credit analysis conducted by lenders evaluates ROAS to determine the sales ability of companies seeking loans, especially with promotion-centric companies. The higher the ROAS, the less risk there is and the more reliable the revenue from each campaign. For merger and acquisition professionals, ROAS trends offer insight into a target company’s sustainability. It helps determine if a company’s advertising campaigns can sustain themselves and keep generating future growth.

It’s equally important to see how ROAS compares against other metrics. While ROAS focuses on revenue generated per dollar spent, the advertising-to-sales ratio looks at the total proportion of sales driven by advertising efforts. Similarly, while ROAS measures the revenue per ad spend, return on investment analyzes the comprehensive profitability for the complete level of marketing expenses – not exclusively advertising. While ROAS is a short-term measure on instant sales, Lifetime Value looks at the customer’s history with the company and the entire revenue the company earns from the relationship.

While this metric is helpful for many professionals, it’s important to ensure that only necessary data is included and customer conversion is monitored precisely in order to get the best output.

The CAC Payback Period looks at how a business needs to recover its investment in attracting new customers. It is especially crucial for companies that are in industries with large marketing and sales costs. It’s an important metric because it helps businesses measure their performance in a number of ways.

First, it shows how well a business is managing its budget. Based on the resulting figure of the CAC Payback Period, the shorter the time required to break even on its customer acquisition costs, the more efficient a company is with its sales and marketing expenses. If, however, the result is high, this signals the company is doing something wrong and needs to analyze its current approach.

Running this analysis can also identify a company’s financial perils. The more prolonged the CAC Payback Period, the more likely a company might be facing cash flow concerns. Whether it is caused by overall economic conditions or industry or company-specific challenges, this is another reason for a company to run the numbers to see how it can mitigate or turn around the costs associated with acquiring customers.

The calculation also can help a business determine if it is able to expand to new products and markets and scale up existing product lines. The shorter the time needed to acquire new customers, the more likely a business can grow.

When investors and lenders analyze a company’s financials, including this metric, the more efficient a company is, and the more likely it will attract investors or have lenders offer favorable financing terms.

How to Calculate the CAC Payback Period

This scenario looks at $300,000 in customer acquisition costs, such as marketing, sales, etc., for a three-month period. The company obtained 1,000 new customers and is expected to gain $200,000 in new monthly recurring revenue (MRR), with an estimated gross margin of 60 percent.

First Step: Calculate the CAC by dividing Sales and Marketing Expenses by the new customers (1,000). It’s expressed as follows:

CAC = Sales and Marketing Expenses/Number of New Customers

CAC = $300,000/1,000 = $300 per customer

Second Step: This is to determine the monthly recurring revenue (MRR) per customer. The new MRR amount is divided by the number of newly acquired customers. It’s calculated as follows:

MRR = $200,000/1,000 = $200 per customer

Third Step: Determine the gross margin or how much remains from revenue after subtracting direct costs. In this case, we’ll use 60 percent.

Fourth (and Final) Step: This step determines how many months it will take to recoup the customer acquisition costs from the profits generated by the newly acquired customer. It’s calculated as follows:

CAC Payback Period = $300/($200 x 0.60) = 2.5

Based on the resulting 2.5 figure, it takes, on average, 2.5 months of profit from the newly acquired customers to pay for the customer’s acquisition cost.

Understanding CAC Payback Period Efficiency

If it’s less than 12 months, it’s favorable. This implies a business has an efficient approach to profitability and growth. However, it’s not a hard and fast rule because the repayment time frame can fluctuate based on the economy and the business operations. If a company is a low-margin business or industry (e-commerce, groceries, etc.), a far tighter payback time frame would be necessary to be viable.

There are many factors that can affect this company-specific measurement, such as the industry or sector, current economic conditions, or the business’ approach to gaining new customers. If a company has a shorter CAC Payback Period in an industry that has a generally accepted longer one, this can imply that the company is more efficient in its operations.

This metric is another tool in a financial analyst’s toolbox that can measure and identify efficiency (or lack thereof) and help put businesses back on track for greater financial health.

No matter the type of business or industry, being able to analyze and deduce patterns is essential to discovering a business’ financial health. Here are four commonly used calculations to help internal and external stakeholders determine an organization’s ability to manage its finances.

Break-Even Analysis

This formula analyzes fixed costs versus the profitability a business earns for every extra item it creates and sells.

Businesses that have smaller thresholds to meet their fixed costs to realize profitability have an easier break-even point to meet and exceed. Once the fixed costs threshold is satisfied and sales revenue outpaces variable costs, a business will know when it hits the break-even point.

Break Even Point (BEP) = Total Fixed Costs/(Price Per Unit – Variable Cost Per Unit)

This takes the total fixed costs divided by the price per individual unit minus each unit’s variable cost.

Examples of fixed costs are rent, taxes, insurance and wages. Examples of variable costs are raw materials, production supplies, utilities and packaging.

Another way to determine a company’s break-even point is as follows:

Contribution Margin = Item Price – Variable Cost Per Unit

This is illustrated by: $55 = ($85 – $30)

The item’s priced at $85, with a variable cost of $30, the contribution margin is $55 of how much revenue a company earns to pay for the remaining fixed costs.

Cash Ratio Formula

The cash ratio formula offers one way to look at a company’s liquidity position by comparing a company’s cash and cash equivalents to its current liabilities or debts due within the next 12 months. It shows how well positioned a business is (or is not) able to pay debts due within 12 months, and to satisfy the near-term obligations of its long-term debt.

It’s an important ratio that lenders look at when evaluating a company’s loan application. Instead of including assets such as accounts receivables, it factors in a business’ ability to take care of its financial obligations. It’s thought of as being a more real world look at how financially stable a business is.

It’s calculated as follows: Cash Ratio: Cash + Cash Equivalents/Current Liabilities.

Gross Profit Margin

This is defined as all income minus the cost of goods sold (COGS). COGS is comprised of expenses attributable to the creation of products, which include input materials and salaries for workers to produce such goods. However, it excludes expenses for taxes, overhead, debt, asset acquisitions, etc., among others. Another way to explain this calculation is to ask how much a business retains as profit once production costs are accounted for.

It’s calculated as follows: Gross Profit Margin = [(Net Sales – Cost of Goods Sold)/(New Sales)] x 100

Debt-to-Equity (D/E) Ratio

This is used to determine how much debt or financial leverage a company has on its books. It tells internal stakeholders and external parties what percentage of debt a company is using to operate compared to the business’ available operating reserves. This ratio contrasts a business’ complete financial obligations against its shareholder equity. Its primary use is to see how extensively it uses debt to operate.

It’s calculated as follows: Debt/Equity Ratio = Total Liabilities/Total Shareholders’ Equity.

While these calculations may seem straightforward, these are only a few examples of how businesses can calculate and analyze a company’s position – be it the owner, an employee or an outside lender or investor.

This metric, which is also referred to as the cash cycle or the net operating cycle, looks at the time a business takes to recover its investment in inventory to eventually sell. The process starts from selling its goods, collecting on outstanding receivables or invoices, and satisfying its operating costs with the sale proceeds. It’s normally measured in days to determine the company’s financial health.

The less time necessary to complete the CCC, the healthier a company is financially because it means the business’ money spends less time tied up in inventory or collecting on outstanding inventory. It’s important to be mindful that different industries have different CCC time frames. Generally speaking, most calculations are done on either a quarterly (90 day) or an annual basis (365 days).

How to Calculate CCC

The formula is as follows:

(CCC) = Days Inventory Outstanding (DIO) + Days Sales Outstanding (DSO) − Days Payable Outstanding (DPO)

It can be broken down into three different stages:

Stage 1

Days Inventory Outstanding (DIO) looks at how many days the inventory takes to sell to customers. It’s calculated as follows:

DIO = (Average Inventory (AI) / COGS) x Time-Frame (In Days)

AI = 1/2 x (BI + FI)

BI = Beginning Inventory

FI = Final Inventory

It’s important to define COGS, taken from the Income Statement, which is Cost of Goods Sold or the costs personally connected to creation of goods or services (raw materials, labor or electricity). The lower the number, the faster a business is selling its goods.

Stage 2

Days Sales Outstanding (DSO) measures the time it takes the business to collect payment from all outstanding sales completed.

DSO = Average Accounts Receivable (AAR) / Daily Revenue

AAR = 1/2 x (SAR + FAR)

SAR = Starting AR

FAR = Final AR

Accounts Receivable are what companies record on their balance sheet to keep track of what customers owe for the goods delivered or services rendered. The lower the results, the better the company’s cash position is because they’re able to satisfy outstanding invoices.

Stage 3

Days Payable Outstanding (DPO) is the third and final stage that calculates how much businesses owe to their suppliers the business has sourced input materials from, within the time frame the suppliers’ invoices are due.  

DPO = Average Accounts Payable (AAP) / Daily COGS

Where:

AAP = 0.5 x (SAP + FAP)

SAP = Starting AP

FAP = Final AP

COGS = Cost of Goods Sold

There are different ways to interpret the DPO result. A low DPO means the business is taking care of its bills from suppliers. However, potential investors, internal managers, and supervisors can see if the business can either negotiate lengthier payment terms while still maintaining good terms or if the company negotiates early payment terms or invests the money on a short-term basis to earn more for the company before paying suppliers’ bills. A high DPO, after an investigation of a company’s financials, might show the company is taking longer than its peers to pay creditors.

While calculating the CCC is relatively straightforward, the more complex process is interpreting it correctly and using judgment for a business based on industry averages and how the numbers relate to current economic conditions.

Analyzing a company’s Accounts Receivables is an effective way to measure its current cash flows and the likelihood of maintaining healthy cash flows. According to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce’s Small Business Index (Third Quarter 2024), 68 percent of small business owners reported being content with their third quarter cash flow performance. This illustrates the importance for small business owners to do everything possible to maintain healthy cash flows, including evaluating the quality of accounts receivables (A/R).

Defining Accounts Receivables

This account or line item on the balance sheet gives the business’ managers/owners and investors a measure on how much money a business expects to receive from selling goods or services. It’s an important metric because it’s a measure of what’s owed, but not yet collected from rendered services/goods.

Consideration for Uncollectable Accounts Receivables

While businesses hope to collect 100 percent of their A/Rs, businesses take a realistic view that not everyone will pay up. For whatever reason, A/Rs aren’t always collected and must be accounted for as uncollectable. Therefore, a contra account is setup to account for accounts receivables that turn into bad debt. This contra account is linked to the accounts receivable, an asset reported on the balance sheet, offsetting the accounts receivable balance. However, there are many metrics for companies to manage their health internally, and some of these metrics are discussed below.

Accounts Receivable-to-Sales Ratio

This is determined by taking a “snapshot” of the ratio or division of the accounts receivables divided by sales over a period of time. The resulting calculation is the percentage of a business’ unpaid sales. The higher the accounts receivable-to-sales ratio, the riskier the company’s financial health. It indicates a business has accounts receivables with a low likelihood of being collected. It’s calculated as follows:

AR to Sales = AR / Sales

Since it measures the mix of how much a business relies on cash versus credit, it can prompt an analyst to determine whether a company is able to operate on minimal cash with low fixed costs and limited outstanding debt. It can also prompt an analyst to determine if a company is subject to cyclical sales and is dependent on the business cycle and whether it’s the right time to invest in a company or hold off until a better entry point is established.

Accounts Receivable Turnover Ratio

This calculation determines how fast a business can convert its accounts receivables into cash. It calculates this over a discrete period, be it a month, quarter, year, etc. It’s calculated as the sales over a period divided by the average accounts receivables balance over the same period. It’s calculated as follows:

ARTR = Net Credit Sales / Average Accounts Receivable

Net Credit Sales = Sales on Credit – Sales Returns – Sales Allowances

Average Accounts Receivable = (Starting + Ending A/R Over a Fixed Time) / 2

The higher the ratio, the less friction businesses have in converting their accounts receivables into cash. One important consideration to keep in mind is that if total sales are used for this calculation, which some business do, the results don’t reflect the original formula because it doesn’t remove the sales on credit or sales allowances.

Days Sales Outstanding (DSO)

This metric reveals how fast (in average number of days) a company is able to turn its receivables into cash. It’s the average accounts receivables divided by net credit sales multiplied by 365. It’s calculated as follows:

DSO = (A/R / net credit sales) x 365 days

The lower the DSO, the better quality and the more efficient a company is in converting its accounts receivables into cash. The higher the DSO, and especially when it goes beyond 90 days, can represent two different financial measures. The first is that the business’ accounts receivables might not be collectable. The second is that the company might be able to make sales but with deteriorating earnings.

While there are many ways to analyze a company’s health, along with many ways to analyze the quality of existing and future accounts receivables, these are a few ways to evaluate a company’s present financial health and prospects for the future.

Sources

https://www.uschamber.com/sbindex/key-findings